The Embassy- Keyes and Obama (Part Two) ~ Alan Keyes is LOYAL TO LIBERTY

Sunday, September 6, 2009

The Embassy- Keyes and Obama (Part Two)

Here is Part two of my interview with Molotov Mitchell explaining the thinking behind my participation in legal efforts to get the evidence needed to resolve the issue of Obama's Constitutional eligibility to be President of the United States.

12 comments:

Anonymous said...: This comment has been removed by the author.; September 6, 2009 at 9:32 PM
Anonymous said...: This is still very relevant. I wondered if I would ever see Part II. Thank You Sir.; September 6, 2009 at 9:33 PM
kenlowder said...: What is the issue that we all can rally around? Is it healthcare? Guns? Taxes? Spending? The IRS? Corrupt politicians? etc, etc, etc. Folks, how can we become a force to be reckoned with if we are all over the map on the issues? Please remember that these folks in washington have very short attention spans. If you can't get to the point and/or you don't have a pocket full of cash they won't hear you. These elected officials can not even read the bills that they are passing.

How about this, The Constitution of the United States! Lets rally around that ignored, abused, tattered, and most important document we have next to the Bible. Lets tell our politicians to stand by and follow the Constitution and its limitations or we will limit them right into jail or worse. This current crop of politicians has led this nation to the brink of failure and they all must go.

If we are lucky we may see a election in 2010. We need to elect new representatives. The entire House of Representatives is up for re-election. They all need to go by their primaries. None of them are fit to return. Many will say that they have voted against these bills that have the public so outraged. So what! The Cap and Trade bill passed the house with a bare majority. If it hadn't been eight RINO's from the GOP it wouldn't have passed at all. Had any of the so called conservatives stood up on their hind legs and filibustered the bill it would not have even come to a vote.

This lack of a spine is why they all must go. As of right now 57% of americans polled think no one should be re-elected. 57%! Lets push to bring this to around 80% by election time! We currently have these politicians to scared to face us at an unrestricted town hall meetings. Lets make them to scared to run in the next election.

Look for, find and support candidates who will support and defend the Constitution of the United States. Don't listen to our current politicians who say that they have gotten the message. We have all heard that lie before. Time is short as the filing deadlines are rapidly approaching. Tell the party that you support that you are leaving until they get someone else to run as you will not vote for an incumbent. Get off the couch and register to vote. Register with a third party so the GOP can see the lose of support.

Rally around the Constitution of the United States and its limitations on our government. This is how we can restore our country and our way of life. Join me in catching the Constitution Flu to help get the message to washington.

Ken Lowder
oneangrytaxpayer.org
Ken@oneangrytaxpayer.org
http://ken-lowder.blogspot.com/; September 7, 2009 at 11:23 AM
kenlowder said...: Catch the Constitution Flu! Why? Because the Constitution Matters!

Its time to take the protest to the next level and make our representatives listen to us, WE THE PEOPLE! Let the national strikes begin! Catch the Constitution Flu. Spend those ‘sick’ days away from work and making purchases. Starve the beast of our income taxes and sales taxes. Let your ‘elected representatives know on the phone and by e-mail that you have had enough of them not listening. Let them know that passing socialist bills in congress without reading what they are signing is not acceptable. Stand on the street corners with a Constitution Flu sign and show the public and the press that you have had enough. Let the press know that their support of the socialist take over of America is over! Visit small business and request they close in support. Explain how they are being put out of business by these UNCONSTITUTIONAL laws.

The next outbreaks are on sept 5-8 over Labor day,sept 11-13 to support the national march on washington dc with a march to your state capitol if you can’t make it to dc yourself. Plan on a big one on Nov 4-7 to celebrate obama’s ascension to what he thinks was his coronation. Future outbreaks will be listed at the sites linked below.

Catch the Constitution Flu and Pass it on!

Ken Lowder
oneangrytaxpayer.org
Ken@oneangrytaxpayer.org
http://ken-lowder.blogspot.com/; September 7, 2009 at 11:24 AM
seekyetruth said...: Thank you so much for keeping this issue alive! The more time passes, the more the people yawn, and it just makes me crazy to see how this presidency is allowed to stand without verification. This from the the most "transparent" administration ever! He just says it and the people are supposed to believe it and anyone who questions it must be a racist. It's so insane, you know it is spiritual blindness.; September 7, 2009 at 12:48 PM
gilbertabrett said...: I agree totally - EVERYONE in the House AND Senate needs to go. I wrote one of my reps the other day and asked why was he hiding behind the phone for a "town hall meeting?" I asked him how would he feel if people who worked for HIM were to email him that they were going to have a phone "meeting." How rude...

They ALL need to go. And I am confident of this one thing... it does not take a ROCKET SCIENTIST to be a representative in our government. It takes MUCH more. It takes class and dignity. It takes morality. It takes sincerity, honesty, integrity and a willingness to roll up your sleeves and get down in the mud - AND READ. It takes a willingness to say NO! and a determination to fight. It takes PRIDE in the AMERICAN way of life and NOT pride in wherever your mother land is. If you are so happy with life back in Ireland, Kenya, Russia or China - PLEASE go back and do your work there. WE DON'T NEED YOU! It takes a backbone and YES it does take a understanding of the fact that OUR country is granted the rights it has by ALMIGHTY GOD - not Muhammad, Buddha, Wicca (who/whatever they worship), frogs, rainbows, tress or any of the other RIDICULOUS things people in this country have sadly grabbed a hold of to "believe" in.

If Christians would stand up and demand that they have the same freedom everyone ELSE has, we would NOT have a King Hussein in OUR White House on this Labor Day! Wake UP America! And STAND UP! Your time is short! It is better to go out fighting than to go out laying on your belly groveling...; September 7, 2009 at 12:53 PM
Derek P. said...: "If you can't get to the point and/or you don't have a pocket full of cash they won't hear you." (kenlowder)

So let's get to the point.

"Barack Obama Sr. and Ann Dunham Obama both snuck out of the country, went to a foreign land, had a child, then snuck back into the United States." ('Your name here.')

That's the point.; September 7, 2009 at 4:17 PM
gilbertabrett said...: ?; September 7, 2009 at 11:38 PM
Derek P. said...: The evidence being sought will prove that to be a fact - that Barack Obama's parents snuck out of and back into the United States. What other conclusion can be arrived at if his birth certificate reads 'Born in Kenya', while no other (Department of State) records exist?; September 7, 2009 at 11:45 PM
gilbertabrett said...: Ok, I get it. I just thought you were being funny for a minute there. I do not know for sure what happened, but I do know that no other president (real one anyway) in our history has been so ashamed of his entire life's work (including his birth) that he has paid millions of dollars to keep it from being shared with even the people who fell down to worship him... I just hope and pray that this "health care" ruse will go up in flames along with cap and trade... and his ENTIRE administration...; September 8, 2009 at 12:04 AM
Anonymous said...: If BO is not a practicing muslim, why did he change his name from a Christian name of Barry Dunham Soetero(?) to the Anti-American Islamic Extremist Muslim name befitting an AntiChrist (Biblical references on youtube "7 coincidences")Barrack Hussein Obama? Wasn't he on ramadan holiday over the summer?

Why does he constantly talk down to Americans (camera angle and verbally) as if we were misbehaving toddlers? He must've missed out when growing up on a lot of proper spankings himself. It's not too late.; September 10, 2009 at 3:35 PM
Unknown said...: The Founders/Framers had no intent(ions) what-so-ever of extending invitations to NON-IMMIGRANT FOREIGNERS to have installed one of their off-spring as Commander-in-Chief the United States Armed Forces. Natural born citizen -- up through the soil and down through citizen parents.; April 19, 2010 at 2:58 AM

Support This Site

Friends of Liberty:

The content I share on Loyal To Liberty takes a good deal of time and effort to prepare. It's offered in the hope that it will prove helpful to people trying to think through the challenges of faithful citizenship during this time of deep crisis for the republican form of government in the United States.

The site is, as it were, freeware, but of course its maintenance and efforts like the pursuit of the facts about Obama's eligibility eat up a lot of man-hours. Your donation will help me and those who work with me. So please click the button below and help out to whatever extent you can. No amount is too small. When everyone chips in, the 'widow's mite' is mighty. Thank you and Godspeed.
(If you would rather send a check or money order make it out to Alan Keyes and send it to: Alan Keyes, PO Box 83759, Gaithersburg, MD 20883.)

THOUGHTLET-The Enemy of my Enemy is ?

The enemy of my enemy is my friend. I've never been sure the old maxim made much sense. It gives your enemies rather too much control over the identification of your friends. What's more, it allows people who really aren't your friends to identify themselves as such just by opposing your enemies. Doesn't that make it easier for your enemies to plant agents in your midst with no more effort than it takes to stage a phony brawl?
Because they live in such a hostile media environment, conservatives are all too willing to embrace any media voice that seems to take on their left wing opponents. But this means that at critical moments (particularly when it comes to personnel choices) they will be susceptible to information provided by people who have only been fighting with their enemies in order to get into a better position to do in the people whose sincerity, ability and leadership offer conservatives the greatest promise of success.
In this regard I have observed that the most important information conservatives can get from Rupert Murdoch's Fox News Channel is silence: the things and people Fox positively ignores. You can be sure someone you know to be conservative is standing firm for what's right when you can't remember the last time you saw or heard anything positive about them on Fox News. Think of all the reporting they've done on the issue of Obama's eligibility for the Presidency.
Listen to the silence. Better yet, learn from it.

For Freedom's Way

Tom Hoefling

http://forfreedomsway.wordpress.com/

For freedom’s way the patriots bled,

The crosses mark our honored dead.

More clearly than mere words e’er may

That field lays out their final say:

No greater love, they gave it all,

In answer to man’s highest call.

But don’t forget that most returned.

To them we owe esteem they earned.

And last of all, remember this:

Our LORD betrayed by one mere kiss.

For from within true danger lies,

Though carefully as friend disguised.

So fight my friend, from where you stand,

For freedom rides on every man.

E pluribus unum

THOUGHTLET "A little thought (that) goes a long way."

During my service as an Ambassador and Assistant Secretary of State under President Reagan, a quiet but constant tug of war went on between the Reagan conservatives and the Bush Republicans, though supposedly all of us were pulling in the same direction. My brief as Assistant Secretary for International Organizations (IO- the bureau that, among other things, keeps track of the goings-on at the United Nations) included implementing Reagan's policy of withholding U.S. contributions to the UN until real management reforms were agreed upon and carried forward. I also got involved with issues that reflected Reagan's principled pro-life stands, and his strong commitment to defend Israel from the Arab inspired lynch mob more or less permanently on call throughout the UN system during those years.

Apparently one of the more polite terms of opprobrium the Bush forces used to pan conservatives like me was that we were excessively "ideological". To tell the truth, I always wore the intended slight as a badge of honor, since it signified their reaction to my consistent efforts to make sure my actions served the ideas and principles Reagan stood for.

Meanwhile whether in or out of power the leftists who control the Democrat party have had no qualms about being "excessively ideological." While the Bush Republicans obligingly kept real conservatives running in place throughout their years of pre-eminence (while sopping them periodically with rhetoric and phony gestures of support), the Democrats looked for ways to promote their agenda of abortion, state atheism, and the erosive destruction of the traditional family (It's the major obstacle to totalitarian government control of the society.) Now that the leftists are surging with confidence, Obama shows no qualms about promoting "excessively ideological" extremists like Chas Freeman and Kathleen Sebelius to positions of controlling authority in the areas where they can do the most harm (from a conservative point of view.) Instead of running in place, they're poised to rush forward, like a good running back exploiting the chink of daylight that signals the way to at least a first down and who knows what more beyond that.

When are conservatives going to wake up and ponder the fact that the acronym for Running In Place is- R.I.P.

THOUGHTLET

As I consider the reaction to my statement that Obama is a communist, I realize how thoroughly the Obama faction's media claque takes advantage of the ignorance even of those who are supposed to be educated and sophisticated spokespeople for conservative views. In this respect I am somewhat disadvantaged by my relatively small stake in this ignorance when it comes to political theory and ideology. For instance, people tend to associate the term "communist" with the violent takeover of government and society. Yet a thoroughly committed communist like Italy's Antonio Gramsci developed an understanding of the nature of political control, and therefore the path to power over a society, far more sophisticated than Marx's economic determinism. (Or was it in fact a more sophisticated understanding of economics?) It was therefore better suited to understanding and exploiting the "ideological" (i.e., spiritual and moral) vulnerabilities of the opponents of communism. In particular, his theories allowed for far greater use of cultural influences (the news and entertainment media, churches and other religious institutions, movements like "gay rights" that contribute to the destruction of moral institutions like the family, etc.) than some people associate with the term "communism". They helped later leftists to understand, explain and avoid (by learning from and adapting the enemy's tactics) defeats like those that fascism inflicted on mid-twentieth century communism in Italy and elsewhere.
Reading Gramsci, one senses that he is looking at the intellectual framework for the Obama faction's secret strategic plan. As Sherlock Holmes knew, there's sometimes no hiding place more secure than one that is in plain sight. Especially in an era when the leftist takeover of education produces fewer and fewer people in each generation who bother to read books, especially the ones without pictures in them. (There's a good summary of Gramsci's thinking at http://www.theory.org.uk/ctr-gram.htm)

THOUGHTLET

Apparently most of the people in Congress who voted on the so-called stimulus package had no time to read it, even superficially. That might seem like fodder for a late night comedy routine, until it occurs to you to wonder who did read it? After all, if the elected representatives of the people are just rubber stamping legislation prepared for them by others, its drafters are the ones dictating the decision. Congress sinks into the role reserved for the People's Congresses in places like North Korea or the now defunct Soviet Union. How quickly the substance of constitutional self-government is being turned into the perfunctory sham characteristic of stolid party dictatorships ruled from the background by a handful of unaccountable little despots.

How many Americans wake up every day longing to live under party dictators, worshiping at the altar of a propagandized personality cult, in a world where party hacks offer the only hope of relief from bureaucratic tyranny? All in exchange for a surfeit of meaningless sex and the license to kill your unwanted offspring.

I used always to think of places under communist yoke as regions languishing under perpetually cloudy skies. Actually though, it wasn't the sun's light it cut off, but the light of true human personality. Would any sane people exchange even the worst risks of life in freedom for such soul stifling banality? Will we?

THOUGHTLET

If it ain't broke, don't fix it. That's not a thought likely to occur to anyone thinking about the banking system these days. It's broke alright. Insolvency is the word of the day, along with that other word, nationalization. Funny how so many people who think the nation state has effectively ceased to exist when it comes to borders and immigration suddenly rediscover its powers when it's time to take over the banks.

"But Alan," you protest "we badly need a solution." Which, I reply, is not a good reason to accept a bad one. In fact , if things have gotten as bad as they say, maybe we should step back so as to let our thinking leap forward.

True, If it ain't broke, you don't fix it. But if it's really broke, you don't fix it either, you throw it away and replace it with something that works better. Instead of taking the bad logic of a failed centralized banking system to its logical conclusion (total centralization), replace the logic with something more suited to the twenty-first century. The twentieth century was all about bigger, more regulated and extensive organization. The hallmark of the twenty-first is the network, the model work-in-progress of which is the internet. It depends on decentralized, individual units, that reach out and form communities based on direct interaction and mutual assessment, rather than a centrally determined distribution of information (like a central bank's fixing the interest rate.)

If the present banking system is failing- let it fail. That's the first step in preparing the way for the emergence of twenty-first century financial networks. Instead of pretending that bankrupt governments can magically save a bankrupt system, accept the fact that the financial Titanic is sinking. Get people out of it, and use what resources we have to construct and launch the fleet of lifeboats in which they can distance themselves from the vortex it causes as it goes down. What I think we'll discover is that the new system we need will emerge from the resulting fleet, as we use twenty-first century tools to turn it into a floating net that won't be susceptible to the cascading disasters of the obsolete vessel. This deserves longer thought, which I give it in the essay Real Change Step Two: Replacing the Federal Reserve.

THOUGHTLET

I think it's not an accident that the American founders spoke of the people as a body (that is an organic whole), but the leftist proto-totalitarians that tutor socialists like Obama speak of them as "the masses." A mass is composed of conceptually identical parts, whereas the body is an organic whole in which each part is defined and differentiated by its individual purpose with respect to the whole.
Is this why there are so many examples of totalitarian regimes that treat people as if they are mounds of dirt to be shaped and repressed, used or discarded (killed) without respect for their individuality? This totalitarian mentality finds a counterpart in the approach that claims to deal with human affairs scientifically, on the assumption that people are no different than other merely physical things.

THOUGHTLET

What signals the difference between a "socialist" and a "communist"? It's the gradual repression of political and civil liberty culminating in the open prosecution and suppression of dissident views. But this suppression cannot come about until a monopoly has been established over access to the seats of government executive and decision making power. The key manifestation of this monopoly is of course some form of party dictatorship.

Aside from all the evidence in his known background, associates, policy preferences and political actions one of the main reasons I make bold to call Obama a communist is his grab for unchecked partisan control over the conduct of the next census. Skillful manipulation of the census could make the decisive contribution to establishing an electorally unchallengeable party monopoly, which would then provide the basis for consolidating party dictatorship. If such dictatorship were not part of their agenda, the Obama faction would leave ultimate oversight of the census process where the Constitution places it, in the hands of the legislative branch. As it clearly is part of their agenda, only ignorance or willful stupidity blinds people to Obama's ambition to establish a better tailored version of Soviet-style government in the U.S.

Of course, there may be another name for what keeps some of the so-called Republicans from speaking out about it. Could it be cowardice?

Copyright Regulations

All material on Loyal To Liberty is copyrighted and you will need to observe these regulations when you plan to distribute or use content from this blog.

You are free to share, distribute or transmit any work on this blog under the following conditions:

Attribution. You must attribute any content you use to Loyal To Liberty by including a link back to the specific content page. You must not suggest that Loyal To Liberty endorses you or your use of the content on this blog.

Even with attribution, you do not have permission to republish the entire blog post on a website.

Only excerpts of less than 100 words from each blog post may be published on other websites. A link back to the specific blog post must be included.

Noncommercial Usage. You may not use this work for commercial purposes unless authorized to do so by Alan Keyes.
Derivative Works. Within the limits heretofore specified, you may build upon the contents of Loyal To Liberty as long as proper attribution (see above) is made.

If you want to syndicate or distribute the full blog post on your website, permission must be obtained before you do so. For permission, please email alan@loyaltoliberty.com.

THOUGHTLET

Everyone's fussing over whether the Alleged Usurper's stimulus plan will help or hurt the economy. Are they missing the point? Massive taxpayer resources are being pumped into Obama's powerbase. His cohorts grow stronger, while the larger economic impact of the plan makes everyone else weaker. Not much of a recovery plan, but a great strategy for securing power.

Then there are all those Hamas loving Palestinians he's using taxpayer money to bring to the U.S. After 9/11 the Palestinians danced in their streets. This time they won't have far to go to dance on our graves.

Alan Keyes is LOYAL TO LIBERTY

Sunday, September 6, 2009