THOUGHTLET
What signals the difference between a "socialist" and a "communist"? It's the gradual repression of political and civil liberty culminating in the open prosecution and suppression of dissident views. But this suppression cannot come about until a monopoly has been established over access to the seats of government executive and decision making power. The key manifestation of this monopoly is of course some form of party dictatorship.
Aside from all the evidence in his known background, associates, policy preferences and political actions one of the main reasons I make bold to call Obama a communist is his grab for unchecked partisan control over the conduct of the next census. Skillful manipulation of the census could make the decisive contribution to establishing an electorally unchallengeable party monopoly, which would then provide the basis for consolidating party dictatorship. If such dictatorship were not part of their agenda, the Obama faction would leave ultimate oversight of the census process where the Constitution places it, in the hands of the legislative branch. As it clearly is part of their agenda, only ignorance or willful stupidity blinds people to Obama's ambition to establish a better tailored version of Soviet-style government in the U.S.
Of course, there may be another name for what keeps some of the so-called Republicans from speaking out about it. Could it be cowardice?
Worth considering? Then don't forget to DIGG IT!!!!
Posts
11 comments:
Alan, you are a great friend of America, a protector of Freedom, and a man that lives by great values.
I am a white male from NYC and would proudly serve you as a great leader.
Never give up the good fight!
Although I hate to say it, I believe you may be correct. I think(and pray) that those who have the courage to speak up need to recognize that it is now the time to do so.
I think that the MSM is actively suppressing those who will speak out and spinning those who, in their judgment, must recieve some coverage to maintain the public's perception of balance.
I am hoping that the internet and blogs like these will give those who are willing to speak out a voice that is denied us in the MSM. I fear that the internet will not remain available to us without censorship for long.
Hello Honourable Mr. Keys,
First of all, let me say that as a Canadian who shares your character and views...thank-you for your courage in standing up for truth.
Much unsettles me about Obama but most unsettling is his devaluing of human life. Regardless of policy, any society that devalues life will cascade into tyranny. As our great Pope states......“The fundamental right, the presupposition of every other right, is the right to life itself. Abortion, consequently, cannot be a human right -- it is the very opposite.” (Pope Benedict XVI) The logic here is that if we fail to see that all other rights are based on the fundamental "right to life" then all other rights will begin to break down. This is what makes acceptance of communism(and its stripping away of rights) possible and likely. This is why Obama is attacking life. The fundamental battle has to be the battle for life.
Liberal socialist and communist need to devalue life in order to move forward their agenda. They do this in very deceiving ways. One way is to exploit science and or bury science. This is why Obama wants to bring science into the white house (so he can control it). We live in a society where "scientific (materialistic)" evidence is god. We need to harness science as well in the defense of life. A seminal "white paper" recently published by Dr. Maureen Condic entitled "When Does Human Life Begin? A Scientific Perspective" refutes a major tenant of the pro-choice argument and Obama administration...as Nancy Pelosi stated..."who can be sure when human life begins?" We can be sure and the science tells us so! Harness this science Mr. Keys and use it for good! You can find this white paper at the Westchester Institute for Ethics and the Human Person.
God Bless you!
Brian Hart
bdjhart@hotmail.com
Alan, sir, brilliant as always. I believe you are dead-on correct about our current president and, quite frankly, it scares me half to death.
I invite you and any other readers whom might have interest to read a short dystopian fiction I wrote just yesterday: The Day My Country Died.
http://charlesrayney.blogspot.com/2009/02/day-my-country-died.html
Please, keep up the good work, for all of our sakes.
Hi! I am an independent candidate in Vermont and I was on the ballot for Governor and for U.S. House in 2008 and I was excluded from most debates and forums. My ballot access petition signatures were certified July 7, 2008. Meanwhile, another independent candidate was allowed to participate in debates and forums even though his petition was not certified until September, to be on the 2008 ballot for governor. During the campaign season for U.S. House, Peter Welch, who was on the ballot as Democrat/Republican, was repeatedly announced in the news as running un-opposed, even though there were five candidates running against him, including myself. Please take the time to read my website about some of the abuse I suffered. I also would like you to know that I agree with you 100% that Obama may not be a natural born citizen. Please read some of what I have written about that subject if you go to my website and scroll to the bottom and click on, What's Wrong With Obama? http://crisericson.com
Cris Ericson
Also, I would like to tell you about a few case cites that support legal action, particularly because in Obama's certification of live birth, in teeny, tiny print in the lower right hand corner, it gives a legal notice: [HRS 338-13(b), 338-19] and please go to http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov and on the right click on Hawaii Revised Statutes and read the entire text of each, 338-19 is for certificates based on old documents that of themselves cannot be used to certify, so the statute is contradictory and should be repealed for being unconstitutional. HRS 338-13(b) is subject to the requirements of 338-16, 338-17 and 338-18. If you have trouble finding these, just use search phrases at http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov click on Hawaii Revised Statutes and in the search box use various phrases, "birth certificate", "certificate of birth", "certification of live birth" and read the entire text to the very bottom of each one, the legislators expect you to be lazy so they save the good stuff at the bottom, then see the date enacted at the bottom and click the link at the very bottom. This legal notice is like a legal notice on a drivers' license. If you have a legal notice on a drivers' license that says "restricted" or indicates a number that means you have to wear eyeglasses or contact lenses, and if you get caught having a traffic accident without your corrective lenses, then you're in big trouble! A legal notice on a certificate proves that there is a LEGAL DUTY. In this case, the statutes, if you read all of them, remember, HRS 338-13(b) is subject to the requirements of 338-16, 338-17, and 338-18 and you also have 338-19 in the legal notice IN TEENY TINY FINE PRINT IN THE LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER OF THE CERTIFICATION OF LIVE BIRTH OF BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, and these prove that he was either born in a foreign country, and/or his original birth information was altered and changed, AND hearsay evidence may have been used. Now, read Hawaii Rule 803 for hearsay, and read the whole thing, because at the bottom it states that Hawaii Rule 803 for hearsay evidence does NOT meet the standards of federal rules of evidence for hearsay. Now, there is another legal notice on the certification of live birth of BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA: (Rev. 11/01)LASER which proves that he received this certificate, which proves that he may have been either born in a foreign country and/or his birth information was altered and changed and the original sealed and a new certificate issued, remember, READ THE ENTIRE TEXT OF EACH STATUTE, THEY SAY ONE THING IN ONE PARAGRAPH, AND THEN CONTRADICT IN A LOWER PARAGRAPH! Why on Earth did Barack Hussein Obama need a new certificate AFTER THE TERRORIST ATTACK ON THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA? He received this certificate after he was over 40 years old! Now, here's some case cites to look at:
"District Court did not abuse its discretion in applying Federal Rules of Evidence rather than Hawaii Health Department rules and in finding results of intoxilizer test admissible under public records and reports exception to hearsay rule of Rule 803(6)(8). United States v De Water (1998, CA9 Hawaii) 846 F2d 528, 25 Fed Rules Evid Serv 748."
"Court of Federal Claims lacks jurisdiction to hear claims against states or their agencies, EXCEPT where states or their agencies acted as agents of United States. Hassan v United States (1998) 41 Fed Cl 149.
Now, clearly, the Hawaii Health Department, in certifying Barack Obama, acted as the agency of the United States Congress and the Electoral College and former Vice President Dick Cheney.
Now, re-read, the entire text, of the applicable Hawaii Revised Statutes and you will see that they give a person a right to call for an administrative or judicial hearing to determine if THE FACTS ON THE CERTIFICATE ARE IN ERROR.
In the State of Vermont, Democrat, Deborah Markowitz, joined an unregistered political action committee, http://mysoapbox.vpt.org which clearly listed as a Coalition member the Vermont Secretary of State, and this unregistered political action committee blatantly promoted three candidates for governor 2008 while fraudulently concealing that there were actually 7 candidates on the official election ballot for governor. No one has taken action against her, because the governor has been re-elected to his 4th term, and benefits from her abuse against the unknown candidates. http://crisericson.com
Cris Ericson Also, Vermont League of Cities & Towns takes member dues from cities and towns and then held a 2008 gubernatorial candidate debate at Killington Grand Resort Hotel and exlcluded some candidates, while promoting others with those taxpayer funds.
VERMONT IS A HOT BED OF CORRUPTION!!!!!!!!!
I see a couple of people forgot their meds again?
I sometimes think it is way past the point of return. As I have said before, as Christians, we know what is going to happen. But as I have asked my Christian friends also, do we just lay down and take whatever these antichristians dish out?
I say no. If I have to have my head severed from my body, then so be it. My life was forever changed when I saw "Pssion of the Christ" and how HE was beat and crucified. I know enough of our American history to know that this is not how we should go out. I also know the people in my family who served in the military did it with honor, hoping for a better tomorrow for THEIR children - ME!
GOD help us all and show us the correct path to take.
Dr. Keyes, As I understand it, the majority of the American people (the rank and file, not the political savvy) realize Obama is a Communist, but they have not been educated on why Communism is a bad thing. My own son asked me recently, "What is wrong with Socialism?"
People simply don't know!
To that end, I recently created a poorly written blog post outlining a brief history of Communism for the uneducated.
I think before we can get any headway in convincing people Obama is a Communist, it is vitally important they understand why Communism is something to fight against, not embrace.
Wouldn't you agree? I would like to see you write an essay on that subject. Mine is woefully inadequate, but I try.
"Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word: equality. But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude."
-Alexis de Tocqueville
www.mindfulcitizen.blogspot.com
Post a Comment
Be advised that this comment section is moderated in order to assure respect for civil proprieties. Posts that use obscenities, scurrilous epithets or that are gratuitously disrespectful of others will be removed ASAP. If you think a comment offensive in this way, report it in an email to alan@loyaltoliberty.com.