Friday, January 8, 2010

Glenn Beck: Better to be silent

In my article today at I further develop my response to Glenn Beck's unwarranted attack on those who want to see the credentials that prove that Obama is constitutionally eligible for the Presidency.  Please return here and leave your reactions and comments.


IlĂ­on said...


It isn't that we know that alleged-President Obama does not meet the Constitutional requirements for holding the office, it is that we do not know that he does meet the requirements. And, it's that we do know that he refused to provide the evidence that he meets the requirements.

Brianroy said...

It is time those in the legal profession rise up and boot Obama out of office on his lack of authority by NOT being a United States Natural Born Citizen, and offering no proof of the same as required in Bute v. Illinois, 333 U.S. 640, 653 (1948)
…the burden of Obama is to prove his claim, and provide documents and other proofs such as laid out in one circumstance in 2001’s 533 US 53, NGUYEN ET AL. v. INS at
@ 54 :
“The mother's relation is verifiable from the birth itself and is documented by the birth certificate or hospital records and the witnesses to the birth.”

@62:” In the case of the mother, the relation is verifiable from the birth itself. The mother's status is documented in most instances by the birth certificate or hospital records and the witnesses who attest to her having given birth.”

Hence, the demand for Obama to produce his Long Form Birth Certificate is a valid demand…and moreso, that Obama prove that a foreign father who made Barack a foreign natural born citizen of Kenya for the first 23 years of his life, and a dual British Commonwealth national for the first 23 years of his life and which duality may STILL be in effect , is somehow a 100% US Natural born or 100% citizen through 2 US Citizen parents.

The burden is on Obama to prove he has the legal right and fulfillments to obtain and hold the office of US President (which he has NOT such a Constitutional right)…it is NOT on “we the people” to “prove” he has NOT that legality.

Brianroy said...

Mr. Beck and everyone needs to be made aware of the dangers of not opposing Obama NOW! On December 17, 2009 AMENDING Executive order 12425, Obama made Interpol immune in “snatch and grabs” of US Citizens (including anybody put on his enemies list), including those made on US soil.

Interpol -- or the police of any police force on Earth, including current and past terrorist nations -- will soon also know who among retired US analysts and Intelligence Agents who they might especially want to kidnap, torture, and kill without repercussion. On December 29, 2009, that was enabled by Obama’s Executive Order 13526, a Tsunami dump of our US Intelligence Classified data to help our enemies.

Technically, an Arab nation swearing out warrants based on information that will be provided by EO 13526, can even legally invite members of Al Qaida to torture US Citizens under the claim of eventually trying them at The Hague, behead the US Citizens, and say “oops”…they died of natural causes (it was “natural” for a Muslim to kill an infidel, is what they will mean), and then completely dispose of the body, never to be exhumed or returned.

Is this how Obama seeks to “change the world”?
In only 12 days, and in 2 executive orders, that is exactly what happened.

An unprecedented erosion of our US Constitutional liberties has been illegally signed over to Interpol's discretion by Obama…and since Interpol means almost every nation on Earth, that means we are mitigated to the whims of our enemies if his EOs are allowed to stand.

The Tyranny has begun in the form of two Executive orders by an illegal and unconstitutional usurper putative President!!

And Glenn Beck would have us do what? Sit back, drink coffee, and those who have spoken up and out for the following of the US Constitution and US Law to wait our turn, authorized only by a usurper's illegal executive order, to be snatched up and sent to the neo-concentration camps of the world? No thanks. The Long Form Birth Certificate is a valid issue, and the quickest legal document to prove Obama is legally NOT a United States Natural Born Citizen.

On the issue of griping that the White House will not debate himself...Mr. Beck, who claims he and his staff did 50,000 hours of research, is caught in hypocrisy on this issue and in his own refusing to debate us over the unConstitutionality of Obama, while demanding that the White House debate him. Curious.

Jason said...

I was part of the call in that morning the 4th of January 2010 and the screen-er answered twice and said i will have Glenn talk about it and hung up on me! Now listening to the puppet 2 days later he was adamant about the constitution. Well Damn it the WHOLE constitution includes the 2nd Article Section one discussing the natural born citizen! The GD newspaper is the the official document for being born in the US! See BERG vs US case!!!

Christian Bone said...

I emailed my senator, Senator Casey, about this issue among others, and in his response he assured me that Obama had produced his birth certificate and it was available at I went to the sebsite and it appears to be correct, but I don't know who the people are or if they are trustworthy. And even if Obama has produced a birth certificate after coming into office, I don't know that I can be certain it was not illegally obtained and forged after he became commander in chief.
What do you guys think?

Sens Fan Happy In OH said...

As a loyal listener to Glenn Beck since his days in Tampa, he has lost all credibility with me after his tirade regarding the birth certificate issue. The man has proven to me he is no better than the hypocrites he fights against in Washington. I hear daily radio ads about Beck wanting "the truth" and yet when confronted with an issue where all people are asking for is "the truth" he launches into attacks.

Obama has not proven a thing regarding his birth. Congress is as corrupt as they come. And those in both political parties are eye-deep in this corruption. Beck's refusal to just look into the facts that people like Mr. Keyes, Ms. Taitz and others have presented is a clear indication that Beck is not truly interested in "the truth" but in something else.

Since when did Mr. Beck's "question with boldness" apply only to those things that he himself deems as worthy of question?I stand by my statement - Beck is showing he is a hypocrite and I am calling him out just as I did when he defended the murder of Terri Schiavo and later backed down and changed his tune. If Beck were a man he would do the same now.

I am not a "birther" as people who question Obama's citizenship are called, but I do have issues of all the secrecy surrounding this man and his past. When a man hides this much of himself, there is something obviously to hide. As the highest elected official in the country I feel his past is something we need to know about and to shed the light of truth on everything from college papers to birth records and beyond if needed.

Mr. Beck - you sir are a hypocrite and you have lost all of my respect. You should be ashamed of yourself to continue to use the words of Thomas Jefferson when you yourself will only question what you feel is worthy of investigation. Shame on you!

Lloyd said...

Article IV of the Constition "gusrantee(s) to every state in this union a Republican form of government" not a democracy. In fact, the word "democracy" does not appear anywhere in the Constitution, Bill of Rights, or the Declaration of Independence. Democracy is only another word for mob rule. Recently I was listening to Barney Frank on TV. In his gross igorance he stated that we live in a democracy. The actions of the 111 Congress is a prime example of mob rule. Not addressing countless requests for redress of grievance shows congresses contempt for our Republican form of government and their embracement of democracy. While throwing our Second Amendment rights on the garbage heap of history congress has not stopped to think that it matters not they think that we will be safer.

I said all that to say this. Do any of you find the contempt shown to our eligibility questions any wonder?

fox artist said...

Dr Keyes, I find that the constitutional requirements for office of the presidency is too narrow and shortsighted. I am glad that your American mother did not give birth to you outside of the US. Otherwise we would have lost a brilliant mind who could not have run for the presidency. Not providing you with that opportunity would have demonstrated an obvious flaw within the constitution itself for not recognising one or both of your parents' American nationality, I would not have denied you that opportunity. Similarly, I would not deny Obama this opportunity, natural birth or not. What matters is his American identity and patriotism of which I am satisfied.
On freedom: Yes, Indeed humanbeings must be free but the expression of freedom outside the context of culture, history and political/social circumstances is not being realistic. Unless one is God Himself, Human freedom cannot exist outside the subjective intepretation of the human mind. If the meaning of freedom within the constitution cannot be adjusted to the devdlopment of history and culture then we also have the ligitimate right to apply the commandments that God had given to Samuel, Moses and Joshua regarding the genocide of certain nations during warfare.
In His divine pedagogy, the same God of History and justice will scorn such actions in our times. It is only when man has been completely liberated from sin that unbridled freedom would be possible. Ask the lynchers, the haters and the decadent. They will tell you that the sentiments, thoughts and rights of humanbeings cannot be attained outside of truth and neither goverments or those who are governed has a monopoly on truth.

DUKE said...

Here what I wrote Beckand look at his reply!!!

We will not see eye-to-eye on this. It's a gigantic waste of time.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Wow
From: "RBailey"
Date: Tue, January 05, 2010 10:25 pm

Glenn I am disappointed that you of all people would make fun of the people for wanting to see O's Birth Cert. What's wrong with wanting to see it? Every President has had to show it but him!!!!! wouldn't that make you think he is hiding something? show it and we will SHUT UP!!!!! You want him out just as much as we do so ask him on the air WHERE IS YOUR BC AT MR O? You have no guts to ask that!!!! So say we are right? then he is out and we have our COUNTRY BACK! and if we are wrong then we are up the creek without a paddle for the next 3 years, plus we will shut up.

Us to love to watch you but not so much anymore.


I love my Country!!!!

Tired x 3 said...

Lloyd - congress has not thrown the second amendment on the scrap heap. There has been no legislation or any other action about the right to bare arms. Please stop with the paranoia

Dawg_em said...

I believe Beck to be a neocon shill. His mission is to say some of the right things at the right time to entice an audience to hang on his every word. And feel good about it while doing so. And since no one is perfect apparently his support for the bankster bailouts can be overlooked. Along with other positions he holds which are unconstitutional. I would have to say he is a Cafeteria Constitutionalist.

One can only hope and pray his listening audience will put down the kool aid and exercise some discernment when it comes to his inconsistencies.


Dawg_em said...


Isn't it a sad irony (or perhaps not ironic at all) that as the U.S. goes about the world installing "democracies" it often happens the majority is made up of radical Islamists who hate our guts?

Dawg_em said...

Christian Bone, is a misnomer. If it's the same bc as has been accepted by the left all along it is a short form. Look for the name of the attending physician and hospital. What any normal bc would show. Better yet, go to They have the most extensive investigation into this. I'm sure they can help.

nra1776 said...

We have a Constitution that needs to be honored. If the Constitution cannot be upheld in this matter of eligibility, then why must any matter relating to the constitution be respected? Are we not falling into anarchy? We are either a nation of laws or a nation of men. If we are a nation of men, then I will begin preparing for the day when men attempt to take away my second amendment right; the only right that can preserve our freedom. I personally can and will uphold the Constitution where my second amendment right is concerned. I believe that there are hundreds if thousands, if not millions, who will do the same. Does the phrase "From my cold dead hands!" mean anything to anybody?
Mr. PresidentQuite frankly, in the words of Charlton Heston: "From my cold dead hands!"

Anonymous said...

Beck is a performer reaching out for higher ratings, he is throwing birthers under the bus for his own personal gain, other than Lou Dobbs no one in major media is convering the eligibility issue. It is up to Obama to prove he is eligible and we should consider him illeglly sitting as President and subject to any form of removal.

Dawg_em said...

fox artist,

"What matters is his American dentity and patriotism of which I am satisfied."

Marxism is anti-liberty and therefore, anti-American. It is anti-God and unjust.

No American, especially a person who represents the nation by virtue of our highest office, should ever demonstrate subservience to a foreign power or potentate by bowing at the waist.

Appointing czars and signing presidential statements that circumvent the constitution are tyrrany.

If your Grandmother says she was at your birth in Kenya and your father was a subject of the British Crown the word 'American' shouldn't be the first word to come to your mind.

Spending several years in a Muslim school in Indonesia where you learn an ideology contrary to American values is, or should be, a red flag.

All of the above applies to BHO. He is the precise reason why our founders insisted on the requirement to be a natural born citizen.

Post a Comment

Be advised that this comment section is moderated in order to assure respect for civil proprieties. Posts that use obscenities, scurrilous epithets or that are gratuitously disrespectful of others will be removed ASAP. If you think a comment offensive in this way, report it in an email to